The aftermath of the 2020 U.S. presidential election remains steeped in controversy and legal battles as allegations of widespread fraud persist.
A recent exclusive report has brought to light a staggering 81 cases of alleged election fraud, with 30 still active in various courts across the country.
What's even more concerning is that not a single court has permitted evidence to be argued in these cases, raising questions about the integrity of the election process and the denial of justice.
Contractors with Cyber Ninjas examine and recount ballots cast in the 2020 general election. Photo: Matt York/ AP file
According to a report by The Post Millenial on Friday, June 7, from the beginning, the 2020 election was marked by unprecedented circumstances. Incumbent President Trump, widely perceived as a tremendously popular candidate, seemed to be on track for victory on election night, only to witness a dramatic turn of events in the following days.
Multiple states abruptly halted ballot counting, and by the week's end, the election outcome had shifted in favor of Joe Biden, leading to widespread skepticism and accusations of foul play.
The release of the accurate list of election fraud cases has reignited concerns about the legitimacy of the election results. With 81 documented cases, ranging from allegations of illegal ballot harvesting to software glitches favoring one candidate, the scale of the alleged fraud is staggering.
Yet, despite mounting evidence and public outcry, the courts have remained steadfast in their refusal to hear arguments or examine the presented evidence.
The implications of this legal deadlock extend far beyond partisan politics. At the heart of the matter lies the fundamental principle of democracy: the integrity of the electoral process.
When allegations of fraud are met with silence from the judicial system, it undermines public trust and casts doubt over the entire election system. The American people deserve transparency and accountability, especially in matters as significant as presidential elections.
Critics of the election fraud narrative argue that the lack of court hearings indicates the weakness of the evidence presented.
They argue that the legal challenges mounted by supporters of President Trump are nothing more than baseless conspiracy theories aimed at undermining the outcome of a free and fair election.
However, such dismissals fail to address the legitimate concerns raised by the substantial number of Americans who feel disenfranchised by the electoral process.
Moreover, the courts' refusal to adjudicate these cases does not absolve the accused of wrongdoing. It only perpetuates a cycle of distrust and polarization, further dividing an already fractured nation.
If there is any hope of healing the wounds of division and restoring faith in the democratic process, it is crucial that these allegations be thoroughly investigated and resolved in a transparent and impartial manner.
President Joe Biden. Photo: Winslow Townson/ AP Photo
The 2020 election will undoubtedly be remembered as a pivotal moment in American history, but not for the reasons initially anticipated. Instead of celebrating the peaceful transfer of power, the nation finds itself embroiled in a bitter battle over the legitimacy of the outcome.
Until the allegations of fraud are addressed in a manner that upholds the principles of justice and fairness, the wounds of division will continue to fester, posing a threat to the very foundation of democracy.
It is incumbent upon all stakeholders, regardless of political affiliation, to uphold the rule of law and ensure that every vote counts.